<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>blog GAMIL: an insider look at design &#187; political city</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gamil.com/tag/political-city/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gamil.com</link>
	<description>elements of inspiration and moments of distraction from a small design firm</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:41:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Raleigh = the most political city in the U.S. &#8230;really.</title>
		<link>http://www.gamil.com/2008/09/16/raleigh-the-most-political-city-in-the-us-really/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gamil.com/2008/09/16/raleigh-the-most-political-city-in-the-us-really/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 19:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>beth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture-Nightlife-Music-Restaurants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local: Raleigh & Beyond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Men's Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raleigh & Beyond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[register]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vote]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamil.com/?p=881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;at least according to a new ranking and survey created by Men&#8217;s Health Magazine.
There were a number of rankings listed, including number of registered voters, percentage of active voters, resident political contributions, campaign spending, etc. The summation of all of that led to the overall &#8220;Most Political&#8221; ranking that Raleigh won.
Apparently, North Carolina in general [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;at least according to a new ranking and survey created by Men&#8217;s Health Magazine.</p>
<p>There were a number of rankings listed, including number of registered voters, percentage of active voters, resident political contributions, campaign spending, etc. The summation of all of that led to the overall &#8220;Most Political&#8221; ranking that Raleigh won.</p>
<p>Apparently, North Carolina in general is pretty highly ranked, with Greensboro sitting at #6 overall and Durham at #34. In comparison, our nation&#8217;s capital, Washington DC was down at #16, and New york was a low #89.</p>
<p>Here are the individual rankings that led to Raleigh&#8217;s #1:</p>
<p>Active Registered Voters: #46  (Durham = #24   Wash DC = #21)<br />
% Counted Ballots: #7  (Durham = #62   Wash DC = #92)<br />
&#8216;08 Pres. Donations = #39  (Durham = #77   Wash DC = #53)<br />
Campaign Spending = #37  (Durham = #73   Wash DC = #2)<br />
&#8216;08 Primary Voters = #7  (Durham = #6,   Wash DC = #66)<br />
&#8216;04/&#8217;06 Senate Voters = #8  (Durham = #24   Wash DC = n/a)<br />
&#8216;04-&#8217;07 Gov Voters = # 4  (Durham = #11   Wash DC = n/a)</p>
<p>Check it <a title="Men's Health Political Cities" href="http://www.menshealth.com/metrogrades/08_oct_political/political.html" target="_blank">here</a> and see how your city ranked.</p>
<p>In order to stay on top, ya gotta vote! In the state of NC, you have to be <a title="Register to Vote in NC" href="http://www.sboe.state.nc.us/content.aspx?id=23" target="_blank">registered by October 10!! </a><br />
Pass it on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gamil.com/2008/09/16/raleigh-the-most-political-city-in-the-us-really/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
